The message on Issue 3 seems to be, either you vote for casinos in Ohio, or you vote against them. But, when we go to the polls November 3, we’ll really be deciding:

**Do we want Dan Gilbert and Penn National’s casino plan
**Do we want to hold out yet another casino plan

In case you haven’t figured it out by now (and the campaign finance records prove it), Truthpac, which is the anti-Issue 3 campaign, is being bankrolled by Jeff Jacobs. Jacobs pretty much owns the entertainment area of The Flats. Jacobs, through his companies, has a stake in casinos in Pennsylvania and West Virginia, both of which attract Clevelanders.

If Issue 3 passes, Jacobs is shut out from the casino business in Ohio, as we’d be amending the state Constitution to give that business to Gilbert and Penn National exclusively. Mountaineer and Presque Isle casinos would have new competition.

If Issue 3 fails, there’s no new competition for casinos just a few miles outside of Ohio. It also opens up the possibility of yet another casino plan going before the voters. Or…will it?

Over the weekend, I saw a portion of an interview with Jacobs done by Channel 3’s Tom Beres. In that interview, Jacobs said he’ll go to the legislature, not to the voters, to find a way to legalize casinos in Ohio. This, after voters will have said numerous times in the last 20 years, “no” to casinos.

I truly believe that Ohio will eventually have casinos. I believe Ohio came too late to the game to be a player in bringing gamblers from out of state. Do I believe Issue 3 is perfect? Not at all.

Here’s one more thing to muddy the water. Jacobs makes money off casinos, yet Truthpac is putting out messages about how casinos hurt communities. What’s the deal with that? Well, I guess the anti-casino message will attract more votes than a “don’t vote for this casino plan, wait for the next one” message.

I hate to say, Issue 3 may be a bad deal, as Truthpac says, but Truthpac isn’t telling all the truth, either.